I have always felt a good mix of professional shots, phone pics and selfies were the way to go. Virtually every top provider will get professional pics every few years at least, and many of them will get 2 shots per year, sometimes more. If you are using a photog who over photoshops, ask him or her to tone that down or get a different photog.  
.
I do agree the photos should be a decent representative of the provider in person.

for the Fantasy, not the reality.  I fully understand the miracles that can be performed with professional makeup, but that is how providers usually appear for the session, so it's still in line with the fantasy.  With that said, I want to see their best presentation that is ACCURATE as far as body proportions.  Too much photo shopping by chubby girls will result in a shortened session and an honest review about the deception.    From what I have seen of your photos, I give you kudos for not trying to mislead potential customers on what to expect when reality and fantasy meet.  

When I interview for a job I wear expensive shoes and an expensive suit. I bring my resume printed out on cotton resume paper. I have a professional headshot for my LinkedIn. None of these things have anything to do with my ability to do my job but I do it anyway. I make myself look like a professional because I want to get paid like one.  

 
It is a huge turnoff whenever I see a provider charging premium, high end prices while their ad only has bathroom selfies and iPhone pics. It feels like showing up to a job interview in sweatpants. If a provider can't put effort into their ads how much effort will they put into my appointment? If a provider can't invest in their career why should I invest in them? As prices go up standards go up.

Over-rated

A friend had a son who published a book a while back and a professional photographer was supposedly a "friend" who would give a great deal.  

The finished product was good, but not worth the $2-3k they charged.  A Samsung Galaxy Ultra or latest iPhone would've done the job well with the right person using it.  

As you alluded to; mis-representation is a good way to get bad reviews if the new client is disappointed and thinks that you were trying to hide your true looks.  Why would he repeat?

…take their business seriously and invest in it.  This includes having P411, having TER reviews, a professional and easy to navigate website - with professional photography that is updated at least every two years.  I also like to see selfies on social media that give a more candid view of their day to day.  

A provider that has professional photography is by no means guaranteed to give a great session, but it does tell me a little bit about how she approaches her business.  If it’s a toss up between selfies only vs. professional photography & selfies I’ll go with the second choice every time.  

But you are right that photo shopped, heavily airbrushed or otherwise misleading photos do no one any good. Nor do I need 30 pictures of a lady in 10 different outfits, sprawled across a Ferrari or lounging in an expensive hotel room. I should have a very good sense of what you look like in 5-10 well done photos.  

I like a little bit of glam, accurate representation, and sexiness. Hopefully there are some photographers out there who can do that for less than a king's ransom.

Not all pro photos are photoshopped.
I had 2 x sessions with Santillo specifically because his photos were good and he would use lighting and poses to get great pics without having to photoshop.  
I had one session with a female photographer and she was lovely but she edited the shit out of them and I didn’t care for or use them.  She just wasn’t as good at getting the best out of her subjects and relied heavily on editing tools to do the job for her.  
My most liked pic ever was not photoshopped either.  
So again, not all expensive photographers photoshop the shit out of pics…but I willl say my experience with male
Photographers yielded better results than the ones with women  

C