just casually wondering if others had litmus test as to rule in or rule out a lady ... for me ..  Very rare to meet someone smaller than D, having more than 100 reviews or under 29 yr old.  (unless the 27 yr old has a DDD chest  LOL kidding)  

anyone else have basic guidelines when selecting a fine lady?    

I look at is to see if they are on P411.  If they’re not I immediately move on.

Service menu/looks vs price

I am good with just about anybody as long as they are not old, fat, ugly, or  a trannie.  I have friends in all four of these categories, but they are not the kind of friends I have sex with.   You could say I have no prejudices when it comes to women, but my dick does.   Lol

I start with a picture that gives me a boner. It could be due to a pose, general looks, some reminder of a past infatuation, etc. Then I filter by price and review.

No gordas, no feas, y no viejas.  

 
AND

 
I will beg for pussy, I will pay for pussy, but I will NOT beg to pay for pussy.

 
Words to live by

1) Am I attracted to her?
2) Are we a good match? (personality, services offered, etc)
3) Can I afford her?
4) Can I verify her?
5) Is her verification method inside my comfort zone?

I look for a flat, fit tummy, narrow hips (or anything but something one might call womanly or wide hips) great BBBJ skills and the willingness to at least attempt to handle a magnum. The ability to handle a pretty active two hour session is also a requirement.  

 
And, yes, I am fully aware of just how politically incorrect that body type preference is. But I’ve been an endurance athlete for decades. I tend to prefer women at least close to the female version of the same body type as me and the female endurance athletes I have dated and continue to lust after.  

 
Still, I recognize that the above is just rationalization. But, really, as long as I’m paying, I don’t think I should have to care about political correctness.

Heh, the politically correct should find the most repulsive person they can to have sex with. Of course they never do.  Because it's all about virtue signaling, not about actually doing anything.

Never pay more than $300 for a hooker.

 
"I can't remember the last time I paid over $300 hr."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/ter-general-board-12/the-us-has-k-girls-and-low-priced-latinas-949795?frmSearch=1#949795

 
For someone who hates fast food, you sure do like patronizing the McDonald's of hookers.

How else could you fuck up what I said about not remembering paying over a certain price into it being a hard and fast rule of mine.

 
Are you really that fucking stupid, or do you just have reading comprehension issues?

 
Speaking of memories, do you even remember the last time you got laid?  You being on a fuck board is like a diabetic hanging out on a website devoted to baking.

I don't believe in political correctness in fantasies. That's the point right? Is to act out some shit while  inside so you don't do something stupid while outside, so to speak.

1. Am I sexually attracted to her? (usually go for curvy + providers with big tits but I’ve been sexually attracted to non curvy providers and or providers that don’t have big tits)

2. Is she in my budget? (I have a max per hour in mind. It’s increased a couple of times. It’s served me well)

3. Is there a (large) deposit needed? (Last new lady I saw required a deposit, but it was only $50 so I had no problem with it. But otherwise, due to issues on the other end, I’ve learned not to pay deposits)

4. Are her screening methods too invasive? (If she needs ID, she ain’t for me)  

5. Services offered (GFEish. I’ve seen ladies that don’t offer bbbj. Still had a great time so I don’t necessarily need that. But I like GFE)

6. Decent reviews. (They don’t need to be 10/10 but at the same time, I’m not trying to see someone that barely lays there)

That’s all I can think of right now.

She and a friend would go shopping at Costco and would try to find the most repulsive member of the opposite sex for their friend to have sex with. The winner found the one who was clearly SO repulsive her counterpart had to agree she'd rather die than fuck that person. It usually involved someone morbidly obese in Spandex.

and furthermore, attractiveness is only part of the equation.  

 
Attitude and demeanor make up a much larger part of the package, though admittedly those are sort of hard to size up without first meeting the person, though there are clues that come across  via her marketing as well as if she posts on the boards, etc.   Photos reveal a lot about a person.   I'm always kind of impressed with my ability to pick up on certain signals that have led to a very good ratio of hits vs. misses.

 
And, sadly, affordability is also a factor as we live in a material world.

Was the point if their little game to just pick out some guy yet NOT actually have sex with him?  Women! Who can figure them out?

and yes while attractiveness really is only part of the equation, it's a REALLY large part as far as I am concerned. lol

 
Of course, I have never pretended to be anything but a shallow pig. oink oink.

shopping, but where I live, affordability is not a factor unless they are physically attractive. I have yet to see a provider that is part of the "all shapes and sizes" market that was not completely affordable.   Its the ones that are DDG with perfect dimensions that push the price up. I agree that attitude and personality are also things I look for, but I don't even get to these unless I find her physically attractive in the first place.

on the flip side, pierced nipples have, to date, been a deal breaker.

Who hijacked your account and posted these?

 
You "balk at K-Girls charging more than $300."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/as-usual-on-subjects-like-this-i-agree-with-you-16412?frmSearch=1#16412

 
You consider $300 to be a "comparable lofty rate"
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/if-that-is-the-case-those-cheapwads-got-exactly-what-they-deserved-23205?frmSearch=1#23205

 
You want some more of your cheap ass $300 links?  I got a million of 'em!  Ha cha cha cha!

I recently found out that P411 ok's are no guarantee with some ladies.

...main litmus test that i always demand....that the provider im seeing.....IS a woman.....i love small tits btw

It was all about who could gross out the other worse. Whilst ridiculing others. Such bad people.

Thank you.

Natural firm breasts, definitely no to the pancakes. Must have TER review or somebody recommended. Occasionally, I'll TOFTT, but pretty much stopped that during the pandemic when the issue wasn't service, but looks. Before, especially with K-agency girls, you'd get - at minimum - a fairly attractive K-girl and the issue would be service. But, it became pretty bad with fat, ugly, and old providers in the K-agency/K-girl scene, that I abandoned that practice.

P411 helps, but if no TER review, then I skip.

 I'll date rubenesque girls as long as they carry it well. Lucy Milano is a favorite of mine. But I favor apple bottom, flat stomach. Cute face is far more important than body shape, though.

 
Hairy pussy is a non-starter. At most, landing strip, but prefer clean shaven.

...attraction has to be the first item on the list.

Her menu must be essentially GFE, with BBBJ being primary (CBJ is a deal breaker).

And reviews (recent with a history of similar input) should confirm.

must be a woman ?!?!?!?  you are very selective .. you just ruled out 50% of the population !   how can you be so snobby  LOL    

By services (I hate the term menu lol), are you looking at our TER profiles or our websites? I only ask because for those of us based in the US there's a fine line we have to walk compared. From what I recall, and the advice passed down from other providers, unlike our colleagues in places like Australia and Canada, it's a bit of a legal faux pas to have our exact services listed our on our websites.

Agree 100%! Any lady that will suck on a stinky, lubed up piece of latex is a NO go for me.

You can't find a nice trex lady who is GFE and can provide BBBJ w/o neutering you with razor sharp teeth?
.
Is this you? Or a relative?
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph60106322abc08
.
Is this why your species is almost extinct? Too much time boinking humans and not producing fertile T-Rex offspring?
.
At least you'll go extinct with a smile on your face.

Add in P411 and some great reviews and you got it!

I too love Lucy Milano

Yeah, those foot-long razor sharp teeth the size of railroad spikes are a bit of a deterrent to enjoyable oral fun.

At least I can provide DATY with a long, lizardy tongue and not present a life-endangering hazard to the lady.

She should, however, have plenty of meaty snacks for afterwards...just sayin'

And it was that big-ass flying mountain that took out most of us...fuckin' meteors!

But before I almost exclsuively went for Asian agencies because most accept anonymity...  

it would be online presence. If I see an ad or whatever, Google your number and come up with zero reputable reviews, presence or a half-assed site, it's a complete no-go.  

 
If we are going by established providers, then anyone that might be a service queen or someone open to some kinky sex, I'm most likely in. My appearance range is fairly lax, especially if you're a service queen. Still, it is not without limits. Big girls need love too, but if you're linebacker size or worse, defensive lineman size, you're out of my range. If you're a meth/c/ron head, I will not want to see you either. Most girls put "party" when its not just weed they be using, so it's a bit of a stopword for me.  

 
If you have a few bad service reviews and are said to be a dead fish more than once, I will likely not see you no matter how good the looks. I'm looking forward to a hot mutual session and a good fuck with a willing participant, not passive or disinterested person. If anything, a good looking woman who can't or doesn't want to fuck, will make me much disappointed than an average looking woman who is average at fucking.

1. no tatoo
2. no silicon
3. no short hair, boy cut or bald head
4. not fat
5. less than 30 yrs
6. cute face
7. minimum 2 positive reviews in the past month