is that you would drag him into the shower and hand him a bar of soap as soon as you have closed the door behind his smelly ass. Why even let it get to reading between the lines of a review?
As you say, many people don't smell their own B.O., or other smells that they become used to. I used to know a guy who lived downwind from the Chino Dairy Preserve in SoCal. After 5 years there, he couldn't smell the cow shit, because he was so used to it, but anyone going to his house could.
Caliber, in terms of mannerisms, hygiene, health, finance,mentality ,etc, and how does it reflect on the Ladies if they choose to discriminate in terms of the services they offered ,and to whom.
Would it be a justified thing to do .
'Hypothetically ' for the guys ,put youself in the position of these ladies for a more honest response.
I don't need a tell all but if I'm interpreting your question correctly, I would agree that reviewers should be objective about themselves and how they showed up for a session. The review should also include some indication about that perhaps having an impact on the experience. If a provider is picky about client's hygiene and grooming that is good for others to know -- they can either use it as a filter for moving on or in their scheduling so they can be sure they show up fresh and neat.
Yeah, they should, but unfortunately some don't, yet expect the same reception.
TER has a lot of eyeballs on it from clients so many women find this place to be a major money making platform. The downside is that very explicit reviews, even if totally factual, lead some men to believe that since Girl A did X menu item with a client, than the reader of that review may feel like he is entitled to the same thing.
Hygiene is the big unknown though. If he comes to the date unshowered and all smelly, does anyone think he should or would get the same intimacy level from a provider compared to a client that is clean as a whistle and minty fresh? I wouldn't think so.
Looking at it from my personal perspective, there have been on some rare occasions when a provider wasnt on her best day with her hygiene, or maybe she just smoked before our session, or whatever, and in those occasions. I may skip past DFK to other activities. It's just a common courtesy to be smelling fresh and recently washed. I think its the least we can do for each other.
I am likely to not include it in my review as a YMMV item. Or a girl could specifically ask me not to and I will respect that.
Sometimes a girl will do it and not want it in a review and other times, much less frequently, the girl and reviews will say she does perform that act but she gets caught up in the moment and allows it. Best to keep your mouth shut in both of those cases. lol
Cause you make her feel special 😱😱😱😂😂😂
CBJ vs BBBJ. Some providers I know hate CIM, so they do CBJ until they can trust the client to not CIM. Also, giving BBBJ vs CBJ is dependent on the guy’s grooming and hygiene. They wanted reviews and their profiles to say CBJ so they wouldn’t set expectations that might not be met. Of course, some guys had to brag “I’m special, I got a BBBJ!” in their reviews.
of a BBBJ. If a provider is advertising herself as GFE, which for me, includes CIM, she needs to specifically tell me she doesn't want it before we start, not when I'm ready to finish. If her TER profile, her website, or other recent reviews indicate that she has CIM her menu, then I will put it in the review if it happens, but not if it doesn't.
Since I stopped accepting an offer of BBFS several years ago, even if it's offered, I will not put it in the review unless she advertises PSE service on her website. It doesn't matter if others claimed it or not in their reviews. If it's offered, I will say it was available, but I declined.
You got my point. Some reviews put ladies in a difficult position. Meaning that unscrupulous people gonna show up wanting the same services. At the same time it has it positive, because many of us depend on reviews to help choose companions.
Yea ,puts the provider in a peculiar position, but at the same future clients wants to know deciding whether or not to see her. Between a rock and a hard place so to speak, it's a tough one.
Many of us have encountered someone in their lives, perhaps in school, or the workplace, with odor issues. For whatever reason that individual does not notice or care that their BO is offensive to all around them,
Consider this person as the client - enough said?
Hence why it is critical to look at the big picture of overall reviews instead of focusing on each individual session, and also consider that, the majority of gents are not posting reviews here, so what you are seeing is only a sample of overall experiences.
is that you would drag him into the shower and hand him a bar of soap as soon as you have closed the door behind his smelly ass. Why even let it get to reading between the lines of a review?
As you say, many people don't smell their own B.O., or other smells that they become used to. I used to know a guy who lived downwind from the Chino Dairy Preserve in SoCal. After 5 years there, he couldn't smell the cow shit, because he was so used to it, but anyone going to his house could.
...to other mongers in terms of services received so I'm sure that they just become fapping material for some. But I still like to contribute occasionally to mongerville, especially if a session is shitty or a provider doesn't live up to the claims.
I believe that if both Providers & Clients correctly review each other then things should go great.
Am sure you ladies would like a client review forum.
The reality of a review is that it's going to be subjective, always. There may be objective elements, and TER is by far the best at extracting and presenting those elements to the reader, but on the whole a review is subjective.
Subjectivity is good, it's a snapshot of the reality that a given reviewer experienced, and, the braver the review, the less BS clouding that subjective reality there will be. The 7/7 in a sea of 9/9, 10/10 reviews are where you find the gold, because you know that guy isn't blowing as much smoke up your ass.
Also, I really, really appreciate when guys admit to hitting it raw, that way I can avoid that provider. Notice 'guys', plural, I mostly discount a single review saying they went raw dog, but if there are multiple reviews mentioning it, then yeah, I take that as gospel. If guys avoid the 'kiss and tell', because they're cowards, that valuable bit of info wouldn't be accessible which makes us all less safe.
True, valuable in that way too as per the last paragraph of your response.
Like allowing greek when the ad doesn't say so, rough sex, etc, bbfs when the ad doesn't say so, it goes on...
The problem is sometimes finding that line. I also feel like if there are ten other reviewers talking about getting into a providers ass and you also got it, you won't be a dissenting opinion.
On the other hand, if she only gave it up to you then you wrote a review that you got it, and now every man in town wants it too from the provider. That is a bad situation and I don't want to put any providers in that situation. On the other hand, I feel obligated to fellow mongers to still review the encounter.
It is a tricky situation with no right solution imo so basically my compromise is that I will not put most ymmv stuff in reviews but I'll do it in some private comm asking for bros to not take it from granted. It is not ideal, and sometimes it feels like I'm cheating bros of info.
Now if the tell all when it's applied to bad things or things that aren't ymmv extras, then yeah I'ma air it out. Anything that can help make the next customer to make an informed decision.