I saw this on a provider who is highly reviewed here her advertisement. Are you?
🤔
When the girls use PSE as BB service. Makes sense to want to see tests from both sides on that one.
Hello QB,
I am tested thoroughly every quarter.
While I have not been asked to present these, I would if required.
Please keep being your stunning QB self!
En mis suenos,
ATTB
It doesn’t have to be in your dreams darling…🥰
I am available & flattery will get you everywhere. Thanks for making me smile. 😊 I was just tested today. I don’t have a boyfriend, or an SO. I don’t engage in BBFS, but I found it very interesting 🤨 to see as a requirement. Glad to see everyone agrees it’s a two way street. 🫶🏽
I get tested yearly. If that’s acceptable, sure why not. But I assume recent means that month. So unless it just happens to coincide with my yearly testing, no. Given the options in LA, I don’t feel the need to go out of my way for a provider who expects it. I saw that ad too. It didn’t distinguish between GFE and PSE. I’m just doing GFE and don’t see the need.
I'll show mine if she shows hers.
I've only been asked once...after an unintended fluid exchange.
You didn't know you were going to nut during sex?
As an anonymous monger, I feel like these are too easy to falsify if you keep the names out, and too invasive if you keep the name.
Not saying providers should or should not do this. Just an observational comment.
For providers who show their own test scores, aren't you scared that some client will see your name?
I don't think the privacy thing matters too much. The STD test is something I usually only see on ads with porn star providers and very high end providers. Most of these women have robust screening procedures that include sharing an ID or other PI. Your privacy is probably already compromised by the time you get around to sharing test results. If you're the kind of guy worried about privacy well then you're probably not the kind of guy she wants to see. This stuff is usually offered by in demand providers who have the ability to turn down clients as they see fit.
.
However, there are testing services used in the adult film industry. It helps performers and verify test results while maintaining some privacy. I've never used it, but other clients have talked about it. Porn star escorts were already signed up so they had their clients use the service. I think the most common one is talent testing services.
The question asked about the providers part as well. Or does the provider not provide her test results?
Usually providers don't want clients to know their real name.
I know some providers who I don't consider high end who do bb but require tests. So I think while I appreciate the answer of "it's a moot point because you will be screened", I'd also try to understand how it would play out with someone who doesnt screen extensively.
This sounds a bit contradictory. How can I provider require an STD test but be someone who doesn't screen extensively? Asking your STD status is pretty invasive even if they aren't asking for a DL photo, LinkedIn or other forms of PI.
.
As I said earlier, third party testing service allows people to exchange test results anonymously. I've never done it but another poster in this thread described his experience. He said after sharing his results she shared hers through the app/service. If they aren't using a third party service things can get dicey for the reasons you've already mentioned. Either you're sharing a medical report with your name and info, or you are redacting/editing the document which introduces the potential for fraud. I would bet in a lot of cases the provider doesn't always share their results (unless they are using TTS).
.
How does this play out? Probably not well. I doubt a low end to mid tier escort is shelling out the $250 to get a gold panel test every few weeks. I bet their clients wouldn't either. The providers test is also unreliable if they've seen a couple of clients between you and their test. Other clients could be faking tests as well. The real question is do you want to go BB with a provider that will bang any anonymous guy without a condom for a few extra bucks? You should probably ask the K-girl clients this. They're the ones willing to jam their raw dick into the fuck factory for $400 bucks. They don't care if the girl has seen 4 or 5 guys the same day. They have the answers you are looking for. I would bet in 99% of cases, they don't do any tests or exchange any info.
.
Banging a provider without protection is probably one of those cases where you can't have it all. I guess it depends if you value your privacy or your health more. If you value your health, you would exchange results with a selective, low volume provider. If you value your privacy, you're probably relying on a provider with lax safety standards.
Thanks for the response.
I will say I don't need to ask kgirl clients this because I am such a client and I know how it goes about std test results (no one asks for them lol).
I was more curious about indie providers since bb has expanded lately it seems.
Anonymous services are interesting, I will explore that.
And its not even p4p specifuc. Pre covid I'd go to swinger/orgy parties and in play areas there'd be girls willing to bb but you did need to show your papers. I always wondered how that would go lol.
For swinger parties, most people use their phones to share results. Every doctors office has an app these days that delivers test results (not just STD tests, all sorts of health tests etc). You and the person you want to fuck go into a corner and show each other your latest results on the doctors app (since phones are usually banned in play areas). Once confirmed the two of you go and fuck. Pretty simple and pretty fun. Privacy in these areas is a concern, but less so than in escorting. People don't worry about sharing the first and last name that is on the report. Of course many people just do whatever, test or no test.
A provider posted her std results. When you looked at them she was positive for BV. If she knew how to read the results she probably would have not posted that. She also does bbfs.
I saw a posting on a reddit forum about the provider stating she requires std results. She probably saw way too instances of providers coming down with STDs on that forum.
Some of the providers are posting ads with cold sores.
Stds are running rampant in the bbfs community in DMV. It was bad in 2024.
Yes I do for bbfs with providers usually high quality or porn stars. It’s usually thru a testing service clinic.
I wouldn’t bother if it was for a bbbj.
I did it once and posted about it clink below. I was mostly ridiculed on the post but got just as many DM’s and thanks for sharing the info. My PSE is actively shooting scenes so maybe that’s the difference? Maybe retired PSE’s are more forgiving? Whatever, it was a great experience and we remain in touch. As my post states I’m not interested in BBFS with anyone - PSE, GFE, or otherwise.
Where are some good places to get no-symptoms tested besides a doctor's office?
They also let me grab a handful of female condoms while there.
Over the counter STD test kit from Walmart online will give you peace of mind before the official test.
Great prices on female condoms on eBay.
I get that there might be some value in providing the results but also tend to put this in the "money only for my time" type of a class. That line never holds LE up or provides any useful protection from a legal standpoint.
Similarly, there is an incubation period for any infection so the test can and do miss early stage infections. Additionally, for the test to be accurate one would need to avoid having sex for the incubation period and then not have sex after the test until the meeting with the provider. How many people are doing that? If not, just how much comfort should one draw from seeing test results?
Not saying getting tested, or even sharing (particularly if you're planning on uncovered sex), but wondering a bit about how much people doing the testing think it reduces their odds of infections? (Clearly testing is what you should be doing to identify a known or discover a non-symptomatic infection and then treat it but that is a bit different.)
It's really to have more peace of mind imo.
It's kind of like screening in a way. If a guy has a secret identity he can use, screening won't reveal his true identity. But at least it will mitigate the other low effort bad actors
Ie, I think of it as a just another filter. But it probably depends on the provider.
Similarly, there is an incubation period for any infection so the test can and do miss early stage infections. Additionally, for the test to be accurate one would need to avoid having sex for the incubation period and then not have sex after the test until the meeting with the provider.
Riding a motorcycle is risky and dangerous even if you wear a helmet. People still do it because it is fun and cool. Safe is a relative term and there is no world where anything is completely safe. There is no such thing as safe sex, only safer sex. The only way to completely avoid the risk of an STD is to not have sex. Not having sex is safer than sex with a condom. Sex with a condom is safer than sex without a condom. However abstinence isn't fun and cool. We all have to find our comfort zone.
I think the difference here is that the tests people are talking about are the other person's test to address risk concerns about participation. So it's not about me choosing to drive a motorcycle and assuming the risks that come with that but me checking other drivers licenses to have some idea my risk of riding the bike is lower than if the other driver does not have a license.
STD test results Is not a 'one off thing',but must be consistent and timely to be effective. Nonetheless, someone who reguires a negative STD test result before sex ,is actually taking responsibility, assuming her status is negative as well.