...if it's not true, then this review should be removed:
"But I made her go back to the all fours position so I could cum on her ass. Suprisingly she told me to cum inside her ass. She spread herself wide open and I shot my load right inside of it. WOW!"
Wow is right... Yes, pornstars are tested regularly, but I bet the reviewer isn't. Would you want to follow this guy?
FYI, Just talked to Ava and the review was straight out of left field to her, she said she had no idea who wrote it and would never let someone do that in a private session, she also said maybe he blew on her ass, but inside it... no way, just thought I'd let you guys know
B-Pop
I recently saw Ava. If she says that it did not happen then I believe her totally.
In a lot of reviews guys say "I came inside of her" with the implicit meaning that he came inside the condom while inside her... I've noticed that in a lot of reviews, condoms aren't mentioned, but that doesn't mean they weren't used: When a guy writes a review he's basically recounting the fulfillment of a fantasy, and often mentioning condoms isn't conducive to the narrative aspect of the story.
But since these reviews are supposedly read in order to be approved for posting, one would think that failure to mention a condom should be cause for rejection of the review.
I would think even with a condom a provider wouldnt allow a pop inside just incase condom does break .
Many do allow it, plus they really can't stop that, think about how hard it would be to make sure every guy doesn't cum inside the condom, it would be near impossible
"But I made her go back to the all fours position so I could cum on her ass. Suprisingly she told me to cum inside her ass. She spread herself wide open and I shot my load right inside of it. WOW!"
What part of that makes you think he wore a condom, but decided not to mention it for narrative and/or fantasy? Am I to assume, he was going to cum "on her ass" inside a condom, but he was "surprised" that she would let him cum IN her ass in a condom?
I think his last sentence makes it pretty clear.
I remember emailing staff on numerous occassions asking for b.s. reviews and information to be removed from my profile to no avail... they didn't even respond to my requests and I was harassed by guys asking me to swallow in sessions because it said I did in my sessions in the profile... I even had guys show up with photo copies of my profile and reviews in hand after I'd explained that I didn't do those things trying to coerce me into doing it... I ALWAYS told them they can leave instead and that I wasn't going to see them at all. In the end I demanded that TER remove my profile all together since they couldn't remove the bullshit that I didn't do from my profile. Since then there have been people that have posted reviews again... But I've often considered having them removed simply because. It pisses me off that TER and sites like it often give free membership based on continuing to post reviews because it often inspires falsehood in reviewing...
A girlfriend of mine still has guys trying to get her to offer a cheaper rate that she offered when under the radar under a different (non-porn) name... Since the review posts both her under the radar name and links it to her porn name (She is now avail publicly and at a higher, porn star rate,) - guys always try that, "oh well on TER it says you are available for this rate here," Her response? She always tells the, "Well I didn't write those reviews and the opinions expressed there are not necessarily mine nor are they necessarily true..." Outing girls that don't want to be outed pften result in getting hit with higher rates... lol!
Oh well... Some people will never learn. Hell, I know I'd rather have no reviews than bullshit I have to hear about year after year...
SL
Sinn, Sorry to hear about guys showing up with copys of peoples reviews, but I have heard other girls say the same thing in the past. First things first, YMMV with almost any provider, just cause one guy was able to do something with a lady doesnt mean everyone will, plus the reviews to get free VIP membership should be stopped, I'm sure there are a few people who have posted a number of fake reviews to get a free membership.
One lady I met said a guy told her I put in my review of her that I went bareback during the session and would like to do the same, so she e-mailed me a little pissed off, asking me why I would lie like that, so I had to send her a copy of the review, which right there in black and white said a condom was used. She of course said she was sorry, but it wasnt her fault, it was the jackass that tried to screw me and her over.
B-Pop
-- Modified on 2/1/2005 11:43:36 AM
The profile system need to be overhauled as well. Lots of guys used to want to bring Seth's review of me along for the ride to demand/ make sure they got everything he did. I would have to remind them that My appointment with Seth was booked for 9 hours and wound up being 12 hours.. If you only book a 1 hour appointment don't expect to take trips around the world and back 5 times over... It's just not going to happen in that short of time! If you want every fantasy you have ever dreamt of explored, (within reason and limitation,) then book more than 1 hour. It's that easy!
all the best,
Sinnamon Love
Well put, if they want every fantasy out of the way in an hour session it may take 5 or 6 sessions, cant cram it all in in a hour...no pun intended.
I think the best Ive heard of anyone ever coming back to one of those guys was one time a lady I met said a guy showed up with a copy of one of my reviews of her and said he wanted the same treatment, well she told me she looked right at him and said "Your not him" as Stan Lee would say Nuff Said, lol, well put if you ask me.
Remember everyone, Your Milage May Very, truer words have never been spoken.
B-Pop
I always ask to finish somewhere on the body, like the butt, chest, face, in mouth ect, so I of course always remove the condom first. No excuse to ad something like that at the end, guy's are all the time try to make it sound like the provider let them go bareback, but read reviews of guy's like Fast Eddie, Big Poppa and a few others, it almost always says "put a condom on" or a "raincoat" or "rubber" or whatever. It is pretty clear in the last sentence of his review what he is trying to say, no doubt about it, but I've met Ava and she wouldn't do that.
I always ask to finish somewhere on the body, like the butt, chest, face, in mouth ect, so I of course always remove the condom first. No excuse to ad something like that at the end, guy's are all the time try to make it sound like the provider let them go bareback, but read reviews of guy's like Fast Eddie, Big Poppa and a few others, it almost always says "put a condom on" or a "raincoat" or "rubber" or whatever. It is pretty clear in the last sentence of his review what he is trying to say, no doubt about it, but I've met Ava and she wouldn't do that.
-- Modified on 2/1/2005 10:58:54 AM
From what I have observed, she knows how this board works. She should also be capable of occassionally checking her reviews, to make sure that there is no misinformation.
If she has not posted on this board to dispell the review, apparently she doesn't care.
But when one does a search of her reviews, or on posts about her, what is normally found is references to: she is an animal, she is a freak, and she will do ANYTHING.
Case in point is the thread from April 7, 2004, where the discussion was about golden and BROWN showers, which was from a review by: Xanadu1958
So I expect; if one reads the posts, and the reviews, it is plain to see that the majority of them refer to her as " will do anything ". My assumption is, if she is willing to do anything, including BROWN showers, anything written about her, is probably true. I do belive that there is even a review where she was picked up in a bar, now how many PS's actually get picked up in a bar?
Personally, when I read the review, it sounded as if he was being very honest. As far as it being an ego trip from him, I don't see it, otherwise, he would have posted about writing the review
...when you've read so much crazy shit about her -- the review doesn't seem that outrageous. And her response to it all - via second parties -- is so blase' that it makes me believe she might be embarrassed that she got caught cuz more than anything.
Whatever. Let's be careful in there, uh, I mean out there.
Well, I talked to her and she said she didnt do it, so thats more than good enough for me and would be for anyone else that really knew her. I have known Ava for allmost two years now and have become very good friends with her and you can call her many things...a Freak, a Animal, a Wild Woman...but the one thing you cant call her is liar. I have asked her a couple other times about some things written in reviews and she didnt side step the questions ever, she would say yes or no, but this one was insane, 100% wrong and needed the record set straight.
She hates the boards and trys to stay away from them as much as possible, but does check in from time to time she has said and has talked about joining TER. Believe me she does care, cares more than most people, thats one of the biggest reasons she dont like the boards.
B-Pop
You know what-why would he "do it" unprotected in the first place-especially if he was concerned about "dangerous"
...his load into a spread-open asshole... Unless of course, the force of the blast does damage to his prostate.
The girl is giving the guy one not the other way around. I haven't read her reviews but I know I've had enough guys call me up from every city asking that I give them one or the other either on their body, genitals, in the mouth or ingested... I started in this business providing golden showers only - for 2 years no guy ever asked me for anything more than that, (oh, except the pilot that always wanted me to diaper him and give him a 5qt enema with ivory soap and water.) I never had a problem with providing golden sahowers and have give a few brown showers in my life as well. The logic from a Fetish Diva's perspective at that time was that if someone is going to pay me my normal hourly PSE rate for me to utilize them instead of a real toilet - then I shuold never sit on a cold piece of porcelein again. I still provide golden showers - but no lnger provide brown showers as it's something I simply can't get into personally. But I must admit that when standing over some guys face watching him struggle to swallow every drop it makes me wetter than you can imagine.
Does that mean that I don't care about myself or others? No... I know if I'm on antibiotics or other meds I won't provide one.. And I've never received a dose of champagne or caviar from a human being myself. Remember - no matter how outrageous a girl's reviews a reviewer may not say/ write things that incriminate himself either... Like the guy that says a girl has all kinds of bad things about her including odors but he stays and does her anyway.
SL
"I must admit that when standing over some guys face watching him struggle to swallow every drop it makes me wetter than you can imagine"-Sinn
Wow!!! In most cases this would gross me out, but maybe this is just me here, but if it was your sexy little ass peeing on me I might be into it, not sure, but I think Sinn may have just turned me into a freak, LOL
-- Modified on 2/3/2005 1:34:28 AM
Bareback is pretty standard in porn, and cumming in the girls ass is not at all uncommon. If I was to pay for a PSE I would expect and accept no less than the real deal porn star experience, including bareback. As for the comment "I bet the reviewer wasn't tested," I think that's sheer speculation at best. There seems to be a click here on TER that is trying to advance the notion that there is some "unwritten rule," and trying to establish that the standard experience conforms with their agenda.
We're not talking about a film shoot where testing is a must. Bareback sex during a provider/hobbyiest PSE is not the norm. At a 1500 or less per hr rate you can expect to see a condom. Even though YOU might "expect and accept no less."