Interesting.

Don't worry, we know - filthy maga traitor cunts are on the side of filthy war criminal putin

Everyone knows the USA is on the side of Ukraine. Moron.  Well, except for the filthy maga traitor cunts.

The only thing that matters is that Trump is still not done sucking Putin's cock and stabbing Ukraine in the back.
I'll lay you odds Trump will blame Zelensky for the failure of the truce talks and stop the aid flowing.

I don’t see him stopping aid if Russia doesn’t accept a ceasefire.

Trump won't blame Putin for not accepting a cease fire. He'll blame Zelensky, just as he blames him for starting the war. It's a lie, of course, but Trump knows his base will accept any lie he tells. They always do. Trump wants the Europeans to shoulder the burden. And they will. But without the US, Ukraine will only get enough aid so they don't lose. But not enough to actually win.
Trump has had it in for Zelensky for not opening an inquiry into Joe Biden like he was told by Giuliani, which led to Trump's first impeachment. When did Trump ever let something like that slide?

And we’re still trying to de-cluster the fuck Biden did.

Trump's first-term foreign policy failures are legion.
1) He gave Un the great gift or credibility by meeting with him and totally failed to get anything in return.
2) He tore up the Iran nuclear deal and is now trying to negotiate what sounds like virtually the same deal.
3) He weakened NATO, got its member nations to make only minor increases in their military budgets, emboldening Putin.

1.  Un got “credibility” from Trump?  What bad outcome sprung from their meeting? None.
2. He tore up Obama’s nuke deal? What did Obama do to get that deal? Reorient our Middle East policy away from Arab & Israeli allies in an attempt to position itself for a deal with Iran. Relied on the Russians to mediate the deal. Ignored the Russian invasion of Crimea as a result.
3. Weakened NATO? NATO was quantitatively stronger at the end of Trump’s term. Can you actually see any weaknesses for us through your liberal tears?

1) Trump was (and still is) the ONLY Western leader to meet with Un. If you don't think that gave him credibility in return for nothing, you are as big a political hack as ever. Trump wanted Un to get rid of his nukes. Un basically stiffed him. Except for a giant "thank you" card
2) The Iran nuke deal got that country to give up 90 percent of its enriched uranium and accept international monitors. If it was so bad, then why is Trump trying to negotiate essentially the same thing? And why is Iran MUCH closer to developing a bomb than before?
3) "NATO was qualitatively stronger" at the end of Trump's term?  BULLSHIT. At the end of Trump's first term only 9 of its 30 members were meeting their financial commitment. More are doing so now because of Putin's attack on Ukraine.
ChicKie wins today's "Partisan Hack Award." Trump has already won the "World's Most Gullible Toolbag Award."

and he had the nerve to blame him for not accepting a cease fire. Trouble is, Vance had just said our terms were that Zelensky agree Crimea belonged to Russia and would never join NATO.
So Trump set completely unacceptable terms, gave up exactly what Russia wanted before the talks even started, then blamed Zelensky for it all.
What's next?
1) Trump will end aid to Ukraine
2) Trump will stop providing intelligence to Ukraine
3) Trump will say it's Europe's problem.
This after Putin completely gamed the cease-fire talks and ordered an Easter cease fire he violated over and over again.
Trump is Putin's tool.
Anyone who can't see this is also Putin's tool.

From The NY Times:
"President Trump lashed out Wednesday on social media against President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, blaming him for the White House’s troubles in negotiating a peace deal to end the war.

Imagine spending the last few years on this board, celebrating the meat grinder that the Ukrainian People were going through and calling it a “fantastic bargain” to get as many Ukrainians and Russians killed as possible, and then when Trump tries to stop this needless bloodshed and genocide that you would call this “stabbing Ukraine in the back”.  

no on is 'rooting for thousands of deaths' you fucking moron.  We're supporting the sovereignty of Ukraine OUR ALLY and denouncing the illegal unjustified war criminal putin's OUR ADVERSARY unprovoked attack on Ukraine.  

Russia has signed numerous agreements since 1991 agreeing to the formation of various republics from the former Soviet Union, accepting their independence and their boundaries.
Then, in 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer its nuclear weapons to Russia "for dismantlement and became a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in exchange for economic compensation and assurances from Russia, the United States and United Kingdom to respect the Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders."  At that time Ukraine had hundreds of nukes in missiles and long range bombers, and was the third-largest nuclear power in the world.
In violation of this accord, Putin attacked Ukraine in 2014 and won several victories, controlling parts of the Donbas as well as Crimea. Ukraine gave the Donbas regions autonomy and Putin, once again promised to respect its boundaries.
We all know what happened in 2022.
In other words, Putin has violated his own sworn agreements and can't be trusted. Anyone who believes what Trump says about Russia and Putin is terminally naive. There is only one person responsible for this was and all those deaths and its Putin. Apparently, Trump is the only one who is foolish enough to do trust Putin. Or is compromised enough to do that.
All this is more than enough to make reasonable people think those pee tapes really do exist. Carville sure thinks so.

…to say that you cheerled the deaths of what could be over a million Ukrainians and over 100,000 Russians as “a great bargain”.

BAHAHAHAAA!!! 1 Million Ukrainians and only 100,000 Russians?  Which is totally in-accurate asinine made up war criminal putin-esk derived numbers - not surprising though - since your hero is convicted felon criminal traitor that lies constantly and a filthy war criminal putin asset as well.  Dumb bitch.

Wanker got it exactly backwards on the casualty count. Which is par for the course. He gets almost everything ass backwards.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War

But ass backwards is still ass-backwards.
I also no longer believe anything Wanker says.
Wanker = Troll + Liar.

Here's actual reality:  

Because war is so destructive, it’s often difficult to make accurate totals of all the causalities. Last I heard, the total on the Ukraine side is state secret that Ukraine doesn’t want anyone to know. But when a larger more populous country attacks a smaller nation we can make an easy guess which side will see greater casualties.  

First of all, do better research.  A quick check shows Ukraine's population is nearly 38 million, which is about 8 million greater than Wanker thought.
Second, Wanker is completely WRONG in basic his analysis of casualty rates on the size of the country. For example in WWII the Soviet Union had BY FAR the largest population of any European country and ALSO had the highest casualty rate. Most important, the casualty rate is ALWAYS higher for the country which is on offense, regardless of population size. That's Russia. Ukraine, precisely because of its smaller population has been on defense except during its failed 2023 offensive.  
Russia also uses the primitive "meat wave" tactic which throws human waves of soldiers at a dug-in enemy causing extremely high casualties compared to the defenders. This was made worse by Russia's heavy losses of tanks and other armored fighting vehicles. They are now using motorcycles and other confiscated civilian vehicles. Their original formations of well-trained soldiers have been chewed up and their new units are made up of lightly-trained conscripts who don't know how to survive in combat.
If you search for casualty rates on google you get a glut of numbers that are all over the place so I'm not going to cherry pick. But NONE of them show Russia with fewer casualties, by far.
And now watch Loser-The-Fake-Marine claim I can't possibly know what I'm talking about since I didn't serve in the armed forces. Trouble is, I'm 100% RIGHT.

Their heaviest losses I believe happened during the German invasion.  

Might I recommend a series of five books by the English military officer Prit Buttar (an Indian name but he's Brit born). It's quite authoritative and marks the first Soviet offensive as beginning in Dec. 1941, only six months after Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa (the invasion of the USSR). After that, the Russians were pretty much on the offensive through April 1945.  
Please try not "doing a CDL on us," in other words opining on things you know nothing about but in an authoritative manner.
Your method of averaging out a realistic casualty number is ham-handed as hell. Which is why I refused to do it. Most people will say that Russia has lost a huge number of men but has the capacity to do so. Will they run out of men before Ukraine runs out of the will to fight? That's the question. But Russia's ability to wage war has been de-fanged for many years. Especially including their equipment losses. They're using donkeys to move supplies to the front, for shit's sake.
And that's not to mention their loss of educated men who fled rather than serve. More than 1 million.
This will injure their ability to create and manufacture things well into the future. Hell, they never really recovered from WWII.
Russia will "take" Ukraine when we and our allies abandon it. Our allies, being the ones bordering the rapacious Putin, will not cut and run. We very well might.

…if we assume the estimates were based upon anything empirical. Many of them are likely not to be anything but made up numbers, but the approach I talked about is how it might be done in a research paper. It has it’s limitations, but such is life. Or if you’re Chinchilla, such is your penis.

Good. We don't need filthy war criminal putin lovers on this planet

From Lavrov’s appearance on CBS’s Face The Nation Today