One major problem however, that he doesn't address.
"They attempted to undermine the integrity of U.S. elections, a fundamental attack on our democracy."
"Beyond investigating how this name was unmasked, we need to know whether the Obama White House was reading political surveilled information about the Trump transition. They have a right to see intel bearing on U.S. national security, not politics."
If they, indeed did the first, attack our democracy, how does one separate national what was done from a national security effort vs. a political one?
Me thinks it will be a long long time before any investigations sort that one out, and much of it may be left to interpretation.
Your first statement isn't even a FACT. Did the FBI analyze the server? Nope. They took the word of a third party. That's hearsay. That's at best circumstantial evidence. However they may know other things not reported. Since then they've admitted there their analysis was faulty. They claimed it was a signature from a certain Russian group but it proved to them that others had that code.
In my mind anyway, it's far more plausible that Wikileaks is right. It was an insider. Not Russia.
Posted By: mattradd
One major problem however, that he doesn't address.
"They attempted to undermine the integrity of U.S. elections, a fundamental attack on our democracy."
"Beyond investigating how this name was unmasked, we need to know whether the Obama White House was reading political surveilled information about the Trump transition. They have a right to see intel bearing on U.S. national security, not politics."
If they, indeed did the first, attack our democracy, how does one separate national what was done from a national security effort vs. a political one?
Me thinks it will be a long long time before any investigations sort that one out, and much of it may be left to interpretation.
Evidence was a plenty in the O.J. case. Shoe print. From foreign made shoes in the right size which almost no one owned in the States. Designer Gloves... All sorts of stuff.
Comey, admitted that they couldn't check the server. They where denied access. They had to take the word for it, from a third party company with links to Clinton. Then they had to back track their methods. That isn't proof. Do you just believe people because they say it? You believed that Comey managed to get through the 655k emails on Weiner's laptop over a weekend? The guy lies/obfuscates for a living.
What you have is a third party said it was the Russians. FBI had to take their world for it. That's sound reasonable to you? Just because a million/billion repeat it, doesn't make it true. The left still thinks Hillary's 33k emails where all about yoga and Webb Hubbell's daughter's wedding.
Posted By: Mr.M.Johnson
he woulda voted "Not Guilty" because there wasn't a video tape showing O.J. killing her AND there wasn't a video tape of O.J.'s signing his confession
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!