As far as the 25 year old kid in your example is concerned, here are the options:
1) He can stay in his parents plan
2) If he doesn’t have enough income, he gets subsidy
3) If he is below the poverty level, he doesn’t have to pay the fine
4) There are more options but the 3 are the straight forward options
So your example of the 25 year old paying thousands of dollars in fine is false.
Moral of the story is, most people have not read one word of ACA. They only repeat the misleading statements of professional liars called Republicans when it comes to ACA.
Do I agree with employers providing insurance when they have 50 plus employees. Absolutely yes because they can purchase health care through the exchange and are able to get it at far lower rates than they could before. If the business doesn’t how to make profit by taking care of their people, they don’t need to be in business. No, I do not think businesses today pay fair wages where the employee are able to take care of themselves.
You have the option of buying your own health insurance or buy it through the exchange so, whether GaG buys it through the exchange or not is not going make or break the exchange.
There are many good things like, annual wellness care, no pre-existing condition based denial, able to keep you children in your plan till they are 26 and no max limit so families doesn’t go bankrupt when one of them gets chronically ill.
Lot of misleading shit flying around with one iota of truth. Perfect, no. Need modification in the future, absolutely and that’s how most things work in the universe