So there's no point in writing a review because TER can change it anyway?  Seriously.. what's the point if they're going to tell you to change your score?  I don't understand how doing that is fair, I mean, they weren't there, they don't know what the score should be!  Even if a girl does enough of the things that EARN a higher score, that doesn't necessarily mean she should GET a higher score.. or does it?  Anyone??

I just asked a similiar question on the Newbie Board.

Just like Paul1991, who commented on Sophies being so willing to please, and her great BBBJ, in his review of her...and now he's treading water, succumbing to white knight pressure....saying he "clicked the wrong box"...when, instead, he wrote about it in the narrative....no box checking, at all...lol..

Such transparent nonsense.

This is the second recent reviewer to compliment Sophies BBBJs...and the second one to retract his claim, make a public "mea culpa"...and change the review.

You could understand one guy making a mistake like that, maybe....but TWO recent reviewers..and BOTH mistook a CBJ for a BBBJ....what gives?

I seldom mistake a CBJ for a BBBJ...seems like Sophie does offer this treat to some of her friends...maybe economic hardships have necessitated some selective menu expansion for our Sophie...nothing wrong with that.

But after delivering the BBBJs, she should have advised the Knights to keep it UTR...instead of forcing these mea culpas...altering honest reviews...and causing this mayhem.

And when we point out the bullshit of it all...white knights, shills, and the related calvary charge...attack the people pointing out these facts...and even influence moderators to try to get them banned.

Better than any TV soap opera.  

-- Modified on 6/24/2008 7:51:08 AM

Well that's just wonderful

You would think they would be smart enough to know that if the guys lose faith in the review system, their business will fold.

Can't blame it on Dave!

That is a first I have heard, they usualy knock them down without asking, I am surprised they asked to mark it up.  That makes absolutely no sense at all.

THere are lots of things about TER that I hate but if it didn't exist at all there would be a lot less intel available for finding new ladies.

provided me with the information.  Although I'd LOVE to reveal the name of the provider, doing so would probably give away the identity of the hobbyist.
BTW, the review was not a bad one - it was simply a little below par for this supposed blue chip provider. One has to wonder why TER is so intent on protecting certain favorite providers from an occasional mediocre review.  As I've written before, everyone can have an off day. Babe Ruth didn't hit a home run in every game; Kirby Puckett sometimes went hitless.  I guess TER just likes to maintain some type of Fantasy Land for providers and hobbyists.  Heck!  Here I've been critical of TER - maybe I owe them my thanks!  Not!

Your "story" doesn't seem to match the facts....

While I can sympathize with your frustration of reviews not getting approved (before I was a mod, I submitted several reviews, 9 were approved, 26 were denied... Mine were usually denied for being TOO graphic, lol!)

However, it's unlikely that the company in Amsterdam that ACTUALLY APPROVES the reviews gives a flying fuck about protecting a particular providers score. the reality of it is there's a simple scoring system for acts preformed in the "juicy details" and approximated numerical values applied...

There's a half a million reviews on TER and damn near that many in the unaproved cache for any number of reasons, don't think so small with yourself in the center of your tiny universe when you attempt to think these things through...