The blue toast thread reminded me about various discussions we've had here about terminology. One that has not come up recently but seems to have had at least two somewhat differing takes (though much overlap) is "What is a K-Girl?".
Used to be that some insisted K-Girls worked for K-Agencies, along with the widely agreed value and quality points. Given the somewhat new shift (mostly LA it seems) to mulitple bookers and not really a fixed/set agency that manages location/schedules is that aspect somewhat diminished? Or perhaps just hidden with the bookers being a bit more indepenent from any specific agency while the girls might largely be connected with specific agencies?
Thoughts?
I think kgirl now implies a Korean provider with a certain baseline service level and *in network"with most of kagencies etc.
Thats my attempt at defining the term. I do think even in socal current situation of multiple bookers per, the agency holdover effects still linger. Bookers still do verification and talk to each other. Girls still often set up leases via org managers and bookers.
However, one advantage of that system is that it's much harder to slap the HT label on the bookers/orgs, imo. Leo's love human trafficking label and always slap it on any agency that employs foreign girls. When girls appear willing and independent and there appears no central authority, it's much harder to claim they were trafficked and put in miserable conditions by the evil trafficker yadda yadda.
Not that I'm a fan of multiple bookers (for selfish reasons) , but it does provide that advantage.
I still consider k-girls to be korean woman that work with booker(s) in aamps that you have to schedule and be screened for. I see Korean girls at FS shops fairly often too but I don't consider them to be k-girls.
Agree. One of the old splits in this discussions was "Do they have to work expressly for an Agency or not?" Some held the view that a Korean provider that worked with a booker (that is hardly limited to Korean or Asian) but was independent from any Agency and maintained their own in-call location was not really a K-Girl. I never held that view and based my position on Korean and then quality and professionalism of the experience, and acknowledged that generally pricing was very competitive.
Seemed like the changes in the past few years makes the whole "must be at an Agency" aspect very moot.
FS?
... and yes, I tried Google and the search on these boards!
FS = Full service
It pertains mainly to AMP's. Some offer HJ (hand job), some offer FS. Lingo of that hobby 😉
I’ve dated many Korean women over the years but they aren’t Kgirls unless they make you gargle with blue or green mouthwash before you kiss them or eat their pussy.
Blue Toast is their brand.
Massage girls don’t blue toast. Civies don’t blue toast. TJ hookers don’t blue toast.
Blue toast is an exclusive Kgirl thing. It defines the brand.
A kgirl session to me is blue toast, shower together(unless just showered), suck, fuck, chat, shower together. This is the basic kgirl footprint! Perfectly fine session plan!
Don't forget blue toast before second shower
While I agree that the blue toast is universal to a k-girl sessions it is hardly what I would say is unique or the defining characteristic.