So one of the local DMV kdolls has numerous reviews alluding to the fact that she in fact prefers BBFS and urges guys to go raw.
How would you feel about this, as a monger that is not interested in that particular option? Her look and the rest of her repertoire is right up my alley, FWIW.Unless she's going to forcibly rape you (which actually sounds kinda hot), I would think any monger could still insist on using a cover, regardless of her preference.
She sounds to me like an honest person. Of course, it feels better. I'm not sure anyone would argue with that. It's just a matter of how much risk you want to take (or she wants to take).
With no upcharge? So it IS so .. 52Joe.
-- Modified on 2/23/2024 9:00:07 AM
I'm in NOVA and am reading those same reviews. I would love to partake in a session with her for a number of reasons based on the reviews -- except for all the BBFS. For one thing, I love DATY, and it messes with my head (both of them) when I see 130+ reviews of her raw-dogging every dick that walks in the door. I'm not so naive to think a "GFE" gal is 100% covered all the time, but at least I can convince myself she's somewhat discretionary.
The other aspect is that I need to mitigate the risk of bringing something home. That's a conversation I don't need. So I pick and choose a K-date once every couple of months. Covered GFE. I realize there's still a risk, but it's gotta be less than exposing myself to whatever the previous 30 guys that week might be carrying.
If a Kgirl wants me to fuck her BB, then I’m going to let her BBBJ CIM me. If I really need to fuck a KGitl, then I am going in with super bare feeling Skyns and then dump a load in her pussy, managed by polyethylene.
50 years ago when I was fucking civies right and left I only had to worry about getting them pregnant, so I pulled out and came on their bellies or butt crack. I got married before aids. Divorced years later and fixed, I prefer to not get involved with civies my age (yuck) so I pay to play. Best hobby ever!